Direct
advanced search
Advertising | Contact Us | Multichannel Merchant Magazine | DM Buyer's Guide | E-Newsletters | Subscribe
Consumers Digest Sues Over Trademark Use
Apr 28, 2004 12:00 PM , By Ray Schultz
buyer's guide
Find any supplier you need - agencies, CRM, fulfillment, lists, e-commerce, paper, printers, telemarketing, and more.
Featured Categories
Lists and Data
Telemarketing
Database Marketing
E-commerce
Web Marketing
Agency & Creative Services
Print, Production & Paper
Lists and Data Processing
:: view all categories
Resource Center
Get free access to more than 50,000 list data cards - one of the most comprehensive databases in the industry.
>> Search Now
This Month in Direct Magazine
Deal With It
Direct had a full house for this year's list roundtable. Considering all the additional responsibilities on brokers' plates, that's impressive...

See Full July Issue


A plumbing fixtures manufacturer has been hit with a lawsuit over alleged misused of Consumers Digest’s trademarks and service marks in its advertising.

Briggs Plumbing Products Inc., of Charleston, SC, used the magazine’s Best Buy seal without permission on its Web site and in ads and brochures, the suit charges. The firm also allegedly used a knock-off version of the seal.

Consumers Digest Communication LLC has asked the court for a restraining order, and for damages and attorneys’ fees. Attorneys for both sides reportedly have opened discussions about a settlement.

According to the complaint, a Briggs toilet, the Vacuity Whisper Vac 6040, won a coveted Best Buy designation in the July/August 1997 issue of Consumers Digest, and again in the March/April 2000 issue.

Briggs never exercised its option to license the Best Buy marks, but it later used them without authorization, the papers allege.

The complaint continues that Briggs lost its eligibility to license the marks when its product failed to be named as Best Buy in a March/April 2004 review of plumbing products. The review “superceded” the earlier ones, it says.

The seals appear in proximity to lines like: “One flush is all it takes.”

Briggs executives had no comment. Attorneys for Consumers Digest had not answered calls by deadline.

The case was filed earlier this month with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern division.



Back to Top

Browse Issues
Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover Direct Cover
0
September 1, 2008 August 1, 2008 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2008 May 1, 2008 April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008
Browse Back Issues
Browse E-Newsletters
0 0 0 0
0
0 0
0